JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 29, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Carlos Eduardo Corssi Otalora Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Recusacion En Contra Del Magistrado Manuel Jose Cepeda Espinosa Con Fundamento En Que El Magistrado Asesoro La Redaccion De Una Investigacion Y Escribio El Prologo De La Obra. Falta De Legitimacion, Toda Vez Que Esta Facultad Esta Conferida Al Procurador General De La Nacion Y Al Demandante. Declara La Impertinencia De La Recusacion
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Empresa De Servicios Publicos De Quibdo En Liquidacion
  • Decisión en derecho respecto de impugnación de sentencia de primera instancia
  • Improcedencia de declaración de nulidad de todo lo actuado
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Dejar sin efecto el auto de 27 de septiembre de 2005 proferido por el Juzgado Civil del Circuito de Quibdo en el tramite de la accion de tutela interpuesta por Alberto Bermudez Moreno en representacion de sus hijos Dennis Paola y Alberto Stevin Bermudez Delgado y, en su lugar, ordenar a ese despacho judicial decidir lo que en Derecho corresponda en relacion con la impugnacion de la sentencia dictada en primera instancia por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil Municipal de Quibdo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.